Oh, I’ll Judge, Motherfucker. I’ll Judge Good.

12 Jan

Oh, hey! Mittens likes to threaten single pregnant ladies with hell and excommunication if they don’t give up their babies. At Pandagon, Amanda Marcotte discusses the religious obsession with controlling women’s sexuality, which is, of course, completely applicable and true, as is the practice of using single mothers as incubators to provide babies to “deserving” couples.

But there’s another element to this story I want to talk about. The interesting (and by interesting, I mean especially fucked up) thing is that the “sin” of extramarital sex had already been committed, but she wasn’t being (formally) chastised and threatened with excommunication for that. Instead, she was in trouble for not following church doctrine and keeping the physical evidence of her “sin” in her life. The policy of requiring women to give up children born out of wedlock for adoption strikes me more as an attempt to keep up appearances than anything else. I’m sure that that the Mormon church would argue that children need two parents, or that women who lack the moral character to refrain from having sex outside of marriage aren’t qualified to raise kids, but really, does anyone doubt that this is about destroying the evidence of the sins of congregation members using the most “moral” means possible?

Many religious communities aren’t built on personal accountability or integrity. They’re built on appearances. It’s more important to look righteous than it is to be righteous. When he was training for the ministry, my father said that he wouldn’t perform a wedding ceremony for a couple who had been living together “for propriety’s sake.” Did he believe in virginity tests or interrogating couples about their sexual relationship if they didn’t live together? Of course not. It wasn’t important that they didn’t have pre-marital sex; it was important that he could pretend they didn’t. The “argument” that queer people can be queer all they want as long as they don’t practice their queerness (ie, love and fuck the people they want to love and fuck) is similar—you can “sin” in your heart all you want, as long as you don’t show physical evidence of your icky, icky gayness.

Obviously, the idea that extramarital sex is a sin is founded on controlling women’s sexuality. But the emphasis on propriety and appearances is just as harmful. It creates deception and prevents people from being authentic. It perpetuates all sorts of abuse. It exacerbates the obsession with control over women’s bodies by encouraging church members to appear scandalized enough to prove themselves to be upright Christians. It’s the reason why the term “tightly-knit community” gives me hives.

It also explains why, as Erin Gloria Ryan writes, Romney’s “views are so wildly inconsistent that I’m beginning to think that Mitt Romney is actually two conflicted souls trapped in the same body, like Gollum from Lord of the Rings.” It’s clear that Romney only gives a fuck about Romney, and while he may have some tendencies toward being a reasonable, thinking human being, he’ll throw them away if he has a chance to make himself look better. He’ll threaten a woman with excommunication and hell if it protects the church’s appearance and, more importantly, preserves his place in its hierarchy. His community, his party, and his religion encourage it.

Advertisements

5 Responses to “Oh, I’ll Judge, Motherfucker. I’ll Judge Good.”

  1. M. Bouffant 01.12.2012 at 16:35 #

    Religion is a cheaper way of keeping the sheep in the herd than martial law or a secret police force. Probably works better, too.

  2. Big Bad Bald Bastard 01.12.2012 at 17:42 #

    Romney’s “views are so wildly inconsistent that I’m beginning to think that Mitt Romney is actually two conflicted souls trapped in the same body, like Gollum from Lord of the Rings.”

    Now, that would be a hell of a campaign commercial!

    It’s clear that Romney only gives a fuck about Romney, and while he may have some tendencies toward being a reasonable, thinking human being, he’ll throw them away if he has a chance to make himself look better.

    I don’t know who the hell would think that would make him look better. That being said, Romney is a goddamn sociopath who will do anything to gain authority. He’s like a slightly more articulate version of Dubya.

  3. ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®© 01.12.2012 at 19:59 #

    I’m beginning to think that Mitt Romney is actually two conflicted souls trapped in the same body

    I’ve seen no reason to doubt my “reptiloid from outer space” theory, thus far.
    ~

  4. Substance McGravitas 01.13.2012 at 13:21 #

    This is an excellent non-political song about having people in your business all the goddamned time. And it’s the ideal of Republicans: what’s more Big Brotherly than the accounting of sins?

  5. truculentandunreliable 01.14.2012 at 12:30 #

    Bouffant–Totally. The fear of being shunned by the pack can be way, way stronger than violence ever could be. Plus, violence as social control is pretty easy to identify, whereas social pressure tends to be more subtle, especially if you’re part of a group that requires that you suspend your own powers of personal judgment and reason for the “wisdom” of a weird old book and maybe a weird old guy who reads from it.

    B^4–I think this would’ve made him look better in the church, not to people who have normal moral compasses. He would have brought her back into the fold, and given her a chance to make up for the dirty, dirty sin she committed. A lot of callous, heartless, murderous bullshit is excused with that thinking.

    Also, hahahahaha, have you heard about the commemoration coins from the 2002 winter Olympics that just have pictures of him on them? That, I think, is the nail in the “hooo boy, this dude’s a narcissistic, sociopathic fuck” coffin.

    ITTDGY–It *is* difficult to discern “robotic sociopathic Republican businessman with perfectly coiffed hair” from “reptiloid,” so you may be correct.

    Sub–That dude’s British. Clearly he does not understand the joy of being a Real Merkin and having Protestants all up in your shit.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: